1. Wikipedia meets pompous academics meets xkcd

    xkcd: "If you think this is too hard on literary criticism, read the Wikipedia article on deconstruction." [http://xkcd.com/451/]
    Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Deconstruction
    wikipedian 1: "Pages referenced by xkcd in the past have often been locked or protected. I noticed this one still is not. While the comic seems to call for improving the page I am worried weather all of the reader base will see it that way"
    wikipedian 2: "The comic doesn't call for improving the page. The comic points at deconstructionists and laughs."
    wikipedian 3: "It seems to me that the added publicity won't hurt this article -- in fact, nearly any edit to it will have no choice but to improve it. For example, the entire "Logocentrism" section could be replaced by "PENIS PENIS PENIS LOL" and it would greatly improve the overall clarity."

Notes